tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1812985003737084262.post5112485841624923385..comments2009-10-24T16:55:12.385-04:00bxiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13262666423559414651noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1812985003737084262.post-16262587379687671672009-10-24T16:55:12.385-04:002009-10-24T16:55:12.385-04:00Actually from the following dump,<br />...<br />79333470 40001df 20 System.Byte[] 0 instance 02f22760 m_buffer<br />79333470 40001e0 24 System.Byte[] 0 instance 02f19e9c m_ReadBuf<br />09206af8 40001e1 28 ....SSH2BufferStream 0 instance 02f2b024 m_ReadStream<br />...<br /><br />m_buffer is closer to m_ReadStream than m_ReadBuf. So in the previous case, the code review should pay more attention on m_buffer instead of m_ReadBuf. However, it is just another case that a managed array overwrites its next object.bxiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13262666423559414651noreply@blogger.com